The 2001 Stanford 9 testing data are on the
State
Education Dept web site.
The State people have been bragging about the improvement from 98 to
2001. The press release from the State Board says:
Virginia students
achieved well above the national average in reading, language, and mathematics
on the 2001 Stanford Achievement Tests (Stanford 9), continuing what is now a
four-year trend of increased achievement on the tests.
Let's look at some of
the underlying data. First, here are the Statewide subject area scores for 2001
Statewide
2001 Stanford 9 Scores |
Grade |
Reading |
Math |
Language |
(Basic)
BATTERY |
4 |
54 |
61 |
61 |
59 |
6 |
59 |
66 |
55 |
62 |
9 |
60 |
55 |
52 |
57 |
and the changes from 1998
Changes in Statewide Stanford 9 scores, 1998-2001 |
Grade |
Reading |
Math |
Language |
(Basic)
BATTERY |
4 |
4 |
8 |
7 |
6 |
6 |
1 |
8 |
4 |
4 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
We see that statewide these scores improved at each grade level and for every
subject to levels that in every case are above the national norm (50). There's no telling whether the SOLs
were responsible for any of this but there is a post hoc inference.
The Richmond data are another matter entirely. We are far behind the
national norms in every subject at every grade level:
Stanford 9 Scores, Richmond, 2001 |
Grade |
Reading |
Math |
Language |
(Basic)
BATTERY |
4 |
30 |
39 |
42 |
38 |
6 |
34 |
39 |
36 |
39 |
9 |
37 |
34 |
33 |
37 |
In fact, those scores are improved from 98:
Stanford
9 Score Changes, 1998-2001, Richmond, |
Grade |
Reading |
Math |
Language |
(Basic)
BATTERY |
4 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
Compared to the nice improvements in the statewide scores, however, these
numbers reveal that Richmond is falling still farther behind. In '98 we
were 20 points behind
Richmond
v. Statewide Stanford 9 Scores, 1998 |
Grade |
Reading |
Math |
Language |
(Basic)
BATTERY |
Average |
4 |
-21 |
-18 |
-13 |
-17 |
|
6 |
-25 |
-25 |
-17 |
-22 |
|
9 |
-22 |
-22 |
-15 |
-19 |
|
Average |
-23 |
-22 |
-15 |
-19 |
-20 |
In 2001 we had fallen to 22 points behind
Richmond v. Statewide Stanford 9 Scores, 2001 |
Grade |
Reading |
Math |
Language |
(Basic)
BATTERY |
Average |
4 |
-24 |
-22 |
-19 |
-21 |
|
6 |
-25 |
-27 |
-19 |
-23 |
|
9 |
-23 |
-21 |
-19 |
-20 |
|
Average |
-24 |
-23 |
-19 |
-21 |
-22 |
with declines vs. the State average in every subject but 6th grade reading
(where we held even) and 9th grade math (where we caught up by one point).
Changes in Richmond v. Statewide Stanford 9 Scores, 1998 to 2001 |
Grade |
Reading |
Math |
Language |
(Basic)
BATTERY |
4 |
-3 |
-4 |
-6 |
-4 |
6 |
0 |
-2 |
-2 |
-1 |
9 |
-1 |
1 |
-4 |
-1 |
Just think: We are paying taxes to support this system that is harming our
schoolchildren and that is falling behind the state average (just
as the SOLs are). Indeed, we are
paying
more taxes than almost any jurisdiction for
much
worse performance. Part of the problem is the School Board is spending
our tax money
on failed programs.
The really surprising thing here is that we are not hearing the enraged howls
of the citizenry. Neither do we hear of a crash program to improve the
Richmond schools. For sure the first step to fixing the schools is to
realize that they are broken. Until we do that, clearly and explicitly, we
must expect that the system will continue to fail its customers.
Back to the Top
Back to the Testing Page
Back to the Issues Page